Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville

Cochranton, PA · ~292 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville: 3.1 TCR = 94% of Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville safety composite

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville: 2.8 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.22× in 2017

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327211 · Cochranton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Guardian Industries …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Guardian Industries -Carleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville averages 3.1 TCR (94% of the Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville falls in its industry

105 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville (292 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 180 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville (292 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 180 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Meadville has more employees than the Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.5 0.7 10 0 0
2016 2.8 1.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327211 · PA · Cochranton

105 Flat glass (e.g., float, plate) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cochranton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Guardian Industries -Carleton 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Durant FG 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal FG -Winlock FG 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal FG -Portage FG 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsylvainia Office 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blommer Chocolate East Greenville 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholas Meat, LLC 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Baking Company of Oxford, Inc. 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vitro Flat Glass LLC 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vitro Meadville Flat Glass LLC 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR JM Manufacturing 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Facility - Weaver / Sommers 75 FTE
NAT-TCR HBSHSEWA05 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - SC - Denver, CO, USA 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Building Products MIAC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shreveport (Lashe) 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tampa Bay Trane 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Hare (Iloha) 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nationwide Office Cleaners, LLC 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Donan Engineering 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.