Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Main Office - Prosper

Prosper, TX · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main Office - Prosper runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Main Office - Prosper: 2.1 TCR = 71% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main Office - Prosper safety composite

Main Office - Prosper scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

Main Office - Prosper injury rate improved

Main Office - Prosper's TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Prosper, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #199/327
  • PHOTO Headquarters / Main
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Headquarters / Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Main Office - Prosper in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main Office - Prosper averages 2.1 TCR (71% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main Office - Prosper TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Main Office - Prosper falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #199 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

Main Office - Prosper (33 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Main Office - Prosper
Main Office - Prosper (33 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Main Office - Prosper has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 7.9 2.6 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.6 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Prosper

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 33 employers in Prosper, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Headquarters / Main 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR doug wall construction inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riley Construction Company, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR J Benton Construction LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SW Seed Company New Deal 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Houston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tejas Feeders LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims LIVE OPERATIONS 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6300 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6300 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR 035-00573 242 FTE
NAT-TCR Allegheny Valve & Coupling, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaman Corporation - Plant 2 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pickens 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain Prairie 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Seydel Companies 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Impact Metals Chicora 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prince Manufacturing 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Cleveland Warehouse 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.