Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors · Pennsylvania

Mainline Excavating, Inc.

Harrisburg, PA · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mainline Excavating, Inc. runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Mainline Excavating, Inc.: 4.9 TCR = 174% of Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mainline Excavating, Inc. safety composite

Mainline Excavating, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

Mainline Excavating, Inc. injury rate improved

Mainline Excavating, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=9.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #82/115
  • PHOTO Scott Dugas Trucking…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Mainline Excavating, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mainline Excavating, Inc. averages 4.9 TCR (174% of the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mainline Excavating, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=9 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Mainline Excavating, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or la establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 115 Excavating, earthmoving, or la employers in Pennsylvania.

Mainline Excavating, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mainline Excavating, Inc.
Mainline Excavating, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Mainline Excavating, Inc. has fewer employees than the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 10.7 5.3 2 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · PA · Harrisburg

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTS 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clary's Sitework 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMPCO Contracting, Inc. 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smiling Porker 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-PA Dairy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Carolina Hangar 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Frackville 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR Seneca Foods Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2391 - Indy Glendale 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LAB Security Systems Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tilted Kilt of Lexington 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progreso LMMM San Antonio #10, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vita Plus - Columbus 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ojai Valley Sanitary District 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPS Engineers 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.