Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Oregon

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX

Portland, OR · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade A.

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX safety composite

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX: 0.7 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.7 in 2020 to 1.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/135
  • PHOTO Southeastern Site De…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southeastern Site Development Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX TCR series: 2020=0.7 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 135 Construction management, highw employers in Oregon.

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX (94 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX
Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX (94 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Maintenance and Operations - 92nd Ave PDX has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · OR · Portland

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southeastern Site Development Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR James Construction Group LLC -Asphalt 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNIFE RIVER - FARMINGTON 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tazewell County Highway Department 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00468 SYSTEM PWR CNTRL CTR 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gresham Line Ops 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dorman Construction Inc. Main Office 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Azria Health Broadwell 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR US128: Omaha 362 - SG 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR US150: Charlotte 260 - SG 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Salisbury/Wilmington HVAC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE V&S Schuler Engineeirng, Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deseret Cattle & Citrus 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Surgery Center 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.