Truss Manufacturing · Wisconsin

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss

Green Bay, WI · ~94 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss runs at 507% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Truss Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss: 16.7 TCR = 507% of Truss Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss safety composite

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2016→2021

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss injury rate improved

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss's TCR fell 6.2 from 20.6 in 2016 to 14.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.6 · 2017=21.0 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=16.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=14.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 507% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Tex Truss Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 102 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tex Truss Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss averages 16.7 TCR (507% of the Truss Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss TCR series: 2016=20.6 · 2017=21 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=16.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=14.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss falls in its industry

421 Truss Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Truss Manufacturing employers in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss (94 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss
Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss (94 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss has more employees than the Truss Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.4 11.3 14 0 0
2020 15.5 12.2 14 0 0
2019 16.1 13.1 16 0 0
2018 12.8 7.3 14 0 0
2017 21.0 19.1 23 0 0
2016 20.6 13.7 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · WI · Green Bay

421 Truss Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tex Truss Inc. 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manion Truss & Components 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrussTheForce 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desert Truss 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Faulks Bros. Construction, Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fireline Sprinkler, LLC 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wall-Tech Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernatello's Pizza, Inc. - Kaukauna Manufacturing 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Lakeshore Rehabilitation Hospital 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Children's Center of Hamden 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Manassas - MB 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Village at Bend 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Surgery Center 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Lifestyles Management - Solivita 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deseret Cattle & Citrus 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE V&S Schuler Engineeirng, Inc. 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.