Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) · California

Maintenance Building

Santa Cruz, CA · ~60 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maintenance Building runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade F.

Maintenance Building: 9.6 TCR = 214% of Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maintenance Building safety composite

Maintenance Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2018→2024

Maintenance Building injury rate improved

Maintenance Building's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=21.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Santa Cruz, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 214% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/65
  • PHOTO Richmond Maintenance…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richmond Maintenance Location # 330013/1815 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Maintenance Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maintenance Building averages 9.6 TCR (214% of the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maintenance Building TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=21.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Maintenance Building falls in its industry

332 Bus transit systems (except mi establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 65 Bus transit systems (except mi employers in California.

Maintenance Building (60 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maintenance Building
Maintenance Building (60 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Maintenance Building has fewer employees than the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 21.9 21.9 11 0 0
2020 15.1 15.1 8 0 0
2019 13.1 5.2 5 0 0
2018 5.7 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · CA · Santa Cruz

332 Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Santa Cruz, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richmond Maintenance Location # 330013/1815 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7040 TRANSIT REGION-DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greater Peoria Mass Transit District 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2662-7061 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Santa Cruz 8,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030253 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dignity Health Dominican Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030253-253001 DOMINICAN HOSPITAL SANTA CRUZ 1,464 FTE
NAT-TCR Blakeney 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Hartford Downtown 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kreider Mechanical Inc. (Kreider, Ayers, & Associates) 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bull-Bond Mfg Corp 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Company - Plant 6 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Co Construction 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frosty Valley Resort, LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Middletown - Public Works Highway 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.