Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Oregon

MAK Metals Inc.

Dallas, OR · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAK Metals Inc. runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

MAK Metals Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAK Metals Inc. safety composite

MAK Metals Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2024

MAK Metals Inc. injury rate improved

MAK Metals Inc.'s TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Dallas, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Magni-Power Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magni-Power Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

MAK Metals Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAK Metals Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAK Metals Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where MAK Metals Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Oregon.

MAK Metals Inc. (39 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MAK Metals Inc.
MAK Metals Inc. (39 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

MAK Metals Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 8.7 5.8 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 6.8 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · OR · Dallas

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 24 employers in Dallas, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magni-Power Company 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantech Industries Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR M&M HOU 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A & H Metals Inc 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harney Rock and Paving Company 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rose City Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coos Bay North Bend Water Board 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Griffin Construction LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-04404 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-04404 FAC-04404-DALLAS-OR 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2315 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2315 164 FTE
NAT-TCR Magni-Power Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Roth Global Plastics - Syracuse, NY 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Rockford 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodensteinter Implement Company - Elkader Location 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stuckey Construction 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antigo Construction, Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.