Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing · Ohio

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc.

New Philadelphia, OH · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. safety composite

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. injury rate improved

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 4.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333995 · New Philadelphia, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #11/16
  • PHOTO Milwaukee Cylinder -…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milwaukee Cylinder - Cudahy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=4 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. falls in its industry

137 Hydraulic cylinders, fluid pow establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 16 Hydraulic cylinders, fluid pow employers in Ohio.

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. (74 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc.
R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. (74 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6

R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. has more employees than the Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2022 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 3 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333995 · OH · New Philadelphia

137 Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 56 employers in New Philadelphia, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Cylinder - Cudahy 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMC P-2 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Engineering Company Plant 2 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jarp Industries 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Ohio Heifer Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE kILBARGER Construction, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steubenville Service Building 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lima Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2115 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2115 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lauren Manufacturing 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper-Standard New Philadelphia 2228 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Mg Wholesale 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health- Midwest Distribution Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rink Printing Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Oregon Cardiology 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 80 Denver Millwork 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mg San Antonio Retail 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance DelMonte Lodge 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 170 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.