Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) · Illinois

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises

Freeport, IL · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) workplace, earning a grade D.

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises: 4.8 TCR = 126% of Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises safety composite

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2018→2024

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises injury rate improved

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises's TCR fell 6.9 from 12.0 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Freeport, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #34/59
  • PHOTO NW Works Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NW Works Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Malcolm Eaton Enterprises averages 4.8 TCR (126% of the Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises TCR series: 2018=12 · 2019=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Malcolm Eaton Enterprises falls in its industry

1,455 Work experience centers (i.e., establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 59 Work experience centers (i.e., employers in Illinois.

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises (60 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Malcolm Eaton Enterprises
Malcolm Eaton Enterprises (60 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Malcolm Eaton Enterprises has more employees than the Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 1.7 3 0 0
2023 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.6 5.6 3 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 12.0 6.0 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · IL · Freeport

1,455 Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 74 employers in Freeport, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NW Works Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Carson Building - 1444 Wolf IWR 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Store 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opportunity Development Centers, Inc - MF 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DAS Grand Ridge, IL 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VDF Agriculture Department 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE AEP Energy - Chicago 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois American Water (Champaign) 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR FHN - Memorial Hospital 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR FHN 1,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helm Mechanical 842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell 630 FTE
NAT-TCR Doris Italian Market Sunrise 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Abulatory Surgery Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amherst County Public Schools 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 5189 - Cary 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateway Community Partners, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MS2 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weaver LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Exposure Landscaping 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.