Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines · Michigan

Managed Programs LLC

Auburn Hills, MI · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Managed Programs LLC runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines workplace, earning a grade C.

Managed Programs LLC: 5.3 TCR = 99% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Managed Programs LLC safety composite

Managed Programs LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Managed Programs LLC: 0.0 → 9.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2023

Managed Programs LLC's TCR rose 9.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #43/55
  • PHOTO OTICS USA, INC. - KO…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OTICS USA, INC. - KODAK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Managed Programs LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Managed Programs LLC averages 5.3 TCR (99% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Managed Programs LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=9.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Managed Programs LLC falls in its industry

221 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 55 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Michigan.

Managed Programs LLC (42 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Managed Programs LLC
Managed Programs LLC (42 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Managed Programs LLC has fewer employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.1 4.5 4 0 0
2022 7.2 3.6 3 1 0
2021 8.8 0.0 3 1 0
2020 5.4 2.7 2 0 0
2019 4.6 2.3 1 1 0
2018 5.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · MI · Auburn Hills

221 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OTICS USA, INC. - KODAK 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sogefi USA, Inc 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GT Technologies Tennessee 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 17601765 LKQ 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Meter 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Jackson 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennings & Sons 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Muskegon 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Interstate Group L.L.C. Kingman Plant 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Concrete Sawing Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Event Group, INC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bunk'd Production 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 21U3 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peck's Market of Jeffersonville 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Technica LLC - DLA GDEC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0042 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.