Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats · Louisiana

Manda - Corporate

Baton Rouge, LA · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manda - Corporate runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats workplace, earning a grade C.

Manda - Corporate: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manda - Corporate safety composite

Manda - Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

87/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Manda - Corporate held a steady TCR band

Manda - Corporate's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/7
  • PHOTO Goldsboro Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goldsboro Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Manda - Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manda - Corporate averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manda - Corporate TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Manda - Corporate falls in its industry

509 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 7 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, employers in Louisiana.

Manda - Corporate (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Manda - Corporate
Manda - Corporate (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Manda - Corporate has fewer employees than the Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · LA · Baton Rouge

509 Meat products (e.g., hot dogs, luncheon meats, sausages) made from a combination of poultry and other meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goldsboro Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCG Industries Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manda - Baton Rouge 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bennett Timber CO LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Proserv Marine Technology 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineville Service Plex 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Sterlington/Perryville Plant 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melbourne Store - # 103 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyworks Solutions, Inc. - Milpitas, CA 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Tool & Machine Corp. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wey Valve, Inc 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.