Hotels (except casino hotels) · New York

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites

New York, NY · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade A.

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites: 1.4 TCR = 48% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites safety composite

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2021

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites injury rate improved

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/403
  • PHOTO Hampton Inn - Winsto…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hampton Inn - Winston-Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites averages 1.4 TCR (48% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 403 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in New York.

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites (20 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites
Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites (20 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Manhattan / NYC Fairfield Inn & Suites has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NY · New York

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn - Winston-Salem 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinseth Hospitality Companies 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radisson 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Issaquah 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JOHNSON POTATO FARMS LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beds & Borders, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Minns Farms LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE H. F. Corwin & Son, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Oscar W. Larson Company (Corporate) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 3066 Keystone Mobile 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingfisher 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR One Point/Corporate Environments 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keyawa Orchard Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE VenuWorks of Holland, LLC. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alyan Pump 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spruce Farms, LLC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.