Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · New York

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc.

Batavia, NY · ~104 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 149% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. safety composite

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc.: 1.1 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2024

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 3.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Batavia, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 149% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #15/35
  • PHOTO ARW CONCRETE CONTRAC…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARW CONCRETE CONTRACTING, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (149% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=10 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 35 Foundation, building, poured c employers in New York.

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. (104 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc.
Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. (104 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.4 5 0 0
2023 5.3 1.8 6 0 0
2022 10.0 7.3 11 0 0
2020 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.7 4.7 6 0 0
2018 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · NY · Batavia

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 81 employers in Batavia, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARW CONCRETE CONTRACTING, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR McClone Construction (Sacramento) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quinn Construction, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Region 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Learning Center 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE G-CNY Group LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - Exelon, Nine Mile Point 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schenectady Hardware and Electric Co., Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Memorial Hospital 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR O-AT-KA Milk Products LLC 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR O-AT-KA Milk Products Cooperative, Inc. 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Hood-Batavia 415 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiff's Treats - H6 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR gary w gray trucking inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemtech Coatings 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Anaheim Plant #16 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sheboygan Paper Box Company 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coastal Films of Florida 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago CCA 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #10 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.