Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · California

McClone Construction (Sacramento)

Shingle Springs, CA · ~187 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McClone Construction (Sacramento) runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

McClone Construction (Sacramento): 4.2 TCR = 149% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McClone Construction (Sacramento) safety composite

McClone Construction (Sacramento) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

McClone Construction (Sacramento) injury rate improved

McClone Construction (Sacramento)'s TCR fell 2.8 from 4.6 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Shingle Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 149% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #77/166
  • PHOTO 1168_2469
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1168_2469 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

McClone Construction (Sacramento) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McClone Construction (Sacramento) averages 4.2 TCR (149% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McClone Construction (Sacramento) TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where McClone Construction (Sacramento) falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 166 Foundation, building, poured c employers in California.

McClone Construction (Sacramento) (187 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McClone Construction (Sacramento)
McClone Construction (Sacramento) (187 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

McClone Construction (Sacramento) has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 6.1 5.6 12 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2021 3.9 1.9 5 1 0
2020 7.3 5.3 18 0 0
2019 3.3 2.4 6 1 0
2018 4.6 4.0 14 0 0
2017 4.6 4.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Shingle Springs

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 8 employers in Shingle Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1168_2469 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.A. Lindman, Inc 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gourmet Specialties Inc - Warehouse 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & C Ag Services Inc 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar - Bld: 5315 - 01 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Ventura S/C 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nehemiah Rebar Services, Inc. - California 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR 62 El Dorado 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 057200-SHINGLE SPG PO 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Opportunity Acres 32 FTE
NAT-TCR The Farfield Company 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Innerplan 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Clay County 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Glencoe Store 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pathway Services Unlimited, Inc. 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ulterra Drilling Technologies, LP 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi-Jack Products 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gordonsville Plant 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.