Printed circuit boards, bare, manufacturing · Minnesota

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards

Bloomington, MN · ~100 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printed circuit boards, bare, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Printed circuit boards, bare, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards safety composite

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2020→2021

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards injury rate improved

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334412 · Bloomington, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO 4Front Solutions
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4Front Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Printed circuit boards, bare, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards falls in its industry

97 Printed circuit boards, bare, establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Printed circuit boards, bare, employers in Minnesota.

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards (100 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 143 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards
Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards (100 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 143 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Manufacture of Rigid Flex Circuit Boards has fewer employees than the Printed circuit boards, bare, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334412 · MN · Bloomington

97 Printed circuit boards, bare, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4Front Solutions 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark Electronics 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unicircuit Inc.; a Subsidiary of TTM Technologies 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Morey Corporation 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE WARNING LITES OF MN 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works Department 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Plumbing & Heating 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR Division #5 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile Division Monroeville Crew Headquarters 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Hardwoods of Ohio, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Humanetcis - Austin 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Wheaton, Police Department 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Dyson Corporation 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gemini Coatings, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE BW Container Systems - Lynchburg, VA 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.