Assisted Living · Minnesota

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living

Eagan, MN · ~100 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living runs at 487% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living workplace, earning a grade F.

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living: 18.5 TCR = 487% of Assisted Living BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living safety composite

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 18.6 in 2017 to 18.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.6 · 2018=20.5 · 2019=17.3 · 2020=17.3 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=18.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Eagan, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.5 · 487% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #223/240
  • PHOTO FM Lake View, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FM Lake View, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living averages 18.5 TCR (487% of the Assisted Living BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living TCR series: 2017=18.6 · 2018=20.5 · 2019=17.3 · 2020=17.3 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=18.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #223 safest of 240 Assisted Living employers in Minnesota.

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living (100 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living
Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living (100 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Southview - Eagan Pointe Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted Living median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.6 6.2 6 0 0
2022 17.4 10.9 8 0 0
2021 19.8 13.8 8 2 0
2020 17.3 15.4 3 6 0
2019 17.3 5.8 9 0 0
2018 20.5 10.3 10 0 0
2017 18.6 8.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Eagan

6,510 Assisted Living employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 285 employers in Eagan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FM Lake View, LLC 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MorningStar at Jordan 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverwoods Indepedent Living by Complete Care 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LJ NASHVILLE MANAGEMENT, LLC 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WARNING LITES OF MN 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works Department 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Plumbing & Heating 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Therapeutics - Prime Landing & Remote 6,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Eagan 4,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 4,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifeworks Services, Inc 3,663 FTE
NAT-TCR AFFIRMA Rehabilitation, Inc 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingman (Azkin) 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritas Collaborative North Carolina 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian-Chinden #167 18.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE WESTPAC LABS Central 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 1955 Monroe Dr Ne 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Bethesda 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Controls 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.