Couplings, pipe, made from purchased metal pipe · Texas

Manufacturing Facility

Navasota, TX · ~102 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manufacturing Facility runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Couplings, pipe, made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade C.

Manufacturing Facility: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Couplings, pipe, made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manufacturing Facility safety composite

Manufacturing Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Manufacturing Facility injury rate improved

Manufacturing Facility's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Navasota, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #47/73
  • PHOTO Elkhart Products Cor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elkhart Products Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Manufacturing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manufacturing Facility averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Couplings, pipe, made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manufacturing Facility TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Manufacturing Facility falls in its industry

337 Couplings, pipe, made from pur establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 73 Couplings, pipe, made from pur employers in Texas.

Manufacturing Facility (102 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manufacturing Facility
Manufacturing Facility (102 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Manufacturing Facility has more employees than the Couplings, pipe, made from purchased met median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 2.8 1.7 5 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 9 0 0
2018 9.1 6.6 20 2 0
2016 3.0 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · TX · Navasota

337 Couplings, pipe, made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 38 employers in Navasota, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elkhart Products Corporation 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ballston Spa 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crest Bending Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beck Manufacturing - Waynesboro Plant 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tier 1 Completions Solutions 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Yard 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver City 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grant Prideco Navasota 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR STgenetics-Navasota 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellwood Texas forge Navasota 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidSouth Electric Co-op 177 FTE
NAT-TCR General Constructors Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 125 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AW of Murfreesboro 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ebert Construction Co., Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bronson & Bratton, Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lre Foundation Repair 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31 Morgan Services Buffalo 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contract Fabricators, Inc. 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.