Metal foil containers (except bags) manufacturing · Tennessee

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation

Oak Ridge, TN · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metal foil containers (except bags) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Metal foil containers (except bags) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation safety composite

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation held a steady TCR band

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Oak Ridge, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/22
  • PHOTO Ultra Clean Technolo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ultra Clean Technology - Hayward (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manufacturing Sciences Corporation averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Metal foil containers (except bags) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Manufacturing Sciences Corporation falls in its industry

827 Metal foil containers (except establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 22 Metal foil containers (except employers in Tennessee.

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation (37 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Manufacturing Sciences Corporation
Manufacturing Sciences Corporation (37 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Manufacturing Sciences Corporation has fewer employees than the Metal foil containers (except bags) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · TN · Oak Ridge

827 Metal foil containers (except bags) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 107 employers in Oak Ridge, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ultra Clean Technology - Hayward 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tailor Welded Blanks Monroe 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixon DDC MD 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNT Manufacturing 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville Hatchery 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dyersburg Electric System 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corp 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE RFW CONSTRUCTION GROUP 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR UCOR 1,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) EPC Work) 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) 1,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1969-MMC1 1,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Boedeker Precision Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Horizon Tile & Carpet SE, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Werner Enterprises/OMANE Terminal 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CARS Recon Inc Darlington 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE R&R Workover Rig Services LLC. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 33 RCT Ft Worth 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dsg Issaquah 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.