Academies, elementary or secondary · Minnesota

Maple Grove Middle School

Maple Grove, MN · ~143 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Grove Middle School runs at 621% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Academies, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Grove Middle School: 8.7 TCR = 621% of Academies, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Grove Middle School safety composite

Maple Grove Middle School scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2024

Maple Grove Middle School injury rate improved

Maple Grove Middle School's TCR fell 5.0 from 8.0 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=19.4 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Maple Grove, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 621% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1413/1589
  • PHOTO Benjamin Franklin Sc…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benjamin Franklin School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Maple Grove Middle School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Grove Middle School averages 8.7 TCR (621% of the Academies, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Grove Middle School TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=7.7 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=19.4 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=3 · BLS 1.4

Where Maple Grove Middle School falls in its industry

3,374 Academies, elementary or secon establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1413 safest of 1589 Academies, elementary or secon employers in Minnesota.

Maple Grove Middle School (143 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Grove Middle School
Maple Grove Middle School (143 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Maple Grove Middle School has more employees than the Academies, elementary or secondary median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.0 2 1 0
2023 11.3 4.1 11 0 0
2022 19.4 19.4 7 0 0
2021 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2018 7.7 5.8 8 0 0
2017 8.0 5.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Maple Grove

3,374 Academies, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benjamin Franklin School 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TURNING POINT ACADEMY 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1459-4300 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windom Area Schools 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Novel Energy Solutions L.L.C. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electronic Communication Systems LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weidner Plumbing and Heating Company 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE McC Corporate Office 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR West Plains Health Service 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 331-Fairfield 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Plumbing and Drain 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Theisen's of Anamosa 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Seattle 3150 S 160th St 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy Health and Rehabilitation of Pleasant Grove, LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Door Corp 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therm, Inc. 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.