Couriers and Express Delivery Services · Minnesota

Mnmpl - Maple Grove

Maple Grove, MN · ~932 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mnmpl - Maple Grove runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Couriers and Express Delivery Services workplace, earning a grade D.

Mnmpl - Maple Grove: 12.2 TCR = 187% of Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mnmpl - Maple Grove safety composite

Mnmpl - Maple Grove scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

Mnmpl - Maple Grove injury rate improved

Mnmpl - Maple Grove's TCR fell 1.3 from 12.1 in 2019 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.1 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=13.0 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Maple Grove, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #84/113
  • PHOTO ILADD - ADDISON A BU…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 463 inj
  • SIZE ~932 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ILADD - ADDISON A BUILDING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mnmpl - Maple Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mnmpl - Maple Grove averages 12.2 TCR (187% of the Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mnmpl - Maple Grove TCR series: 2019=12.1 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=13 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Mnmpl - Maple Grove falls in its industry

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 113 Couriers and Express Delivery employers in Minnesota.

Mnmpl - Maple Grove (932 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mnmpl - Maple Grove
Mnmpl - Maple Grove (932 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Mnmpl - Maple Grove has more employees than the Couriers and Express Delivery Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 8.5 62 4 0
2023 12.9 10.6 79 10 0
2022 11.7 9.3 80 9 0
2021 13.0 11.2 91 5 0
2020 12.5 9.4 83 11 0
2019 12.1 9.7 68 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Maple Grove

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ILADD - ADDISON A BUILDING 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DID3 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 70 BACKUS RD 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLATTSBURGH (NYPLB) 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Minneapolis Police Dept. 933 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin 930 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unifi Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis 935 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winona Health Services 935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Service Center-UA 610 FTE
NAT-TCR Iladd - Addison a Building 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Enclave of Scarborough 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East Hanover Nj 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend Smelting and Recycling, LLC 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Book Company - Harrisonburg North 932 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrier Clinic 932 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Environmental Services, LLC 932 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Charles Chemical Complex 932 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.