Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · Indiana

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant

Milford, IN · ~241 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant runs at 401% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant: 13.2 TCR = 401% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant safety composite

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2019

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant injury rate improved

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant's TCR fell 8.2 from 16.3 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.3 · 2017=15.2 · 2019=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Milford, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 401% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #12/17
  • PHOTO Maple Leaf Farms, In…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 84 inj
  • SIZE ~241 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., SER Plant and DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant averages 13.2 TCR (401% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=16.3 · 2017=15.2 · 2019=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 17 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Indiana.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant (241 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant
Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant (241 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant has fewer employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.2 5.4 18 0 0
2017 15.2 11.4 28 0 0
2016 16.3 13.9 38 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · IN · Milford

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 18 employers in Milford, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., SER Plant and DC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecumseh Plant 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turkey Valley Farms 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grannis Plant 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zentis North America LLC 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenneco 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Beverage Inc 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer Store 186 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chore-Time - Milford 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE LEAF FARMS, INC. - SERENADE & DC 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., MLS Location 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brock - Milford 202 FTE
NAT-TCR Total Property Management Group LLC 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Islamorada (Flisl) 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulsa (Okuls) 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ofa 24 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE #521 Hamilton Marketplace Shoprite 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eli's Cheesecake Company 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio State Waterproofing 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Transfer Inc. 241 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.