Nursing homes · Pennsylvania

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

Portage, PA · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center: 8.5 TCR = 130% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center: 8.6 → 14.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 14.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.76× in 2018

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 6.3 from 8.6 in 2016 to 14.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Portage, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 130% of ind

  • DART 14.9 DART
  • RANK #454/754
  • PHOTO RidgeWood Health Cam…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RidgeWood Health Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center averages 8.5 TCR (130% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=14.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #454 safest of 754 Nursing homes employers in Pennsylvania.

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center (66 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center (66 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 14.9 14.9 8 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 8.6 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Portage

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Portage, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RidgeWood Health Campus 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocala Health and Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversicare of Claiborne 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview at the Park, Inc. 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bream Orchards Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donegal Egg 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE George E Ley Company 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Mehoopany Site Construction 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Labor Company 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Yard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starprint Publications, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Southern Vermont College 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Location - 251 Mobley Lane, Erin, TN 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Campus 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drake-Williams Steel (MSD) 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakkota Louisville Westport 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of St Clair Shores City Hall 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Doctors White Rock Evs 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.