Health program administration · Arizona

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260)

Phoenix, AZ · ~430 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Health program administration workplace, earning a grade D.

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260): 4.1 TCR = 129% of Health program administration BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) safety composite

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260): 2.8 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2024

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260)'s TCR rose 2.4 from 2.8 in 2019 to 5.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 129% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #10/13
  • PHOTO King County Public H…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 84 inj
  • SIZE ~430 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: King County Public Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) averages 4.1 TCR (129% of the Health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) TCR series: 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) falls in its industry

267 Health program administration establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Health program administration employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) (430 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260)
Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) (430 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Maricopa County - Correctional Health (260) has more employees than the Health program administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.5 14 7 0
2023 4.9 3.0 17 3 0
2022 4.9 1.1 17 1 0
2021 3.6 1.6 13 0 0
2020 3.3 3.1 13 0 0
2019 2.8 2.3 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · AZ · Phoenix

267 Health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR King County Public Health 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AuSable Valley Community Mental Health 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (22) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAN076-PHFE-CAN076 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tempe Office 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Electronics USA 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3771 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cliff Castle Casino 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Rock Hill 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AHF Products 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chai Point 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Calportland Construction - Ready Mix Division 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magic City Casino 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE UX-Grove City, PA 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Takumi Stamping Inc 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baldwin Paving Co, Inc 430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.