Chassis, automobile, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Marinette Plant

Marinette, WI · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marinette Plant runs at 740% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chassis, automobile, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Marinette Plant: 24.4 TCR = 740% of Chassis, automobile, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marinette Plant safety composite

Marinette Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.6

2016→2024

Marinette Plant injury rate improved

Marinette Plant's TCR fell 18.6 from 36.9 in 2016 to 18.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 36.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=36.9 · 2017=24.4 · 2018=28.4 · 2019=27.1 · 2020=30.4 · 2021=20.4 · 2022=18.2 · 2023=15.7 · 2024=18.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Marinette, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.4 · 740% of ind

  • DART 12.2 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Executive Bus Builders
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 132 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Executive Bus Builders (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Marinette Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marinette Plant averages 24.4 TCR (740% of the Chassis, automobile, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marinette Plant TCR series: 2016=36.9 · 2017=24.4 · 2018=28.4 · 2019=27.1 · 2020=30.4 · 2021=20.4 · 2022=18.2 · 2023=15.7 · 2024=18.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Marinette Plant falls in its industry

158 Chassis, automobile, manufactu establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Chassis, automobile, manufactu employers in Wisconsin.

Marinette Plant (59 employees, TCR 24.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Marinette Plant
Marinette Plant (59 employees, TCR 24.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Marinette Plant has fewer employees than the Chassis, automobile, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.3 12.2 3 0 0
2023 15.7 3.9 4 0 0
2022 18.2 3.6 5 0 0
2021 20.4 5.1 12 0 0
2020 30.4 15.2 14 0 0
2019 27.1 13.6 20 0 0
2018 28.4 11.9 24 0 0
2017 24.4 7.8 25 0 0
2016 36.9 11.8 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · WI · Marinette

158 Chassis, automobile, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 58 employers in Marinette, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Executive Bus Builders 23.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daesol Material Georgia, LLC 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dort Plants 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHICAGO ASMBY 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insight FS - Antigo 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington Service Center 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Buildings Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCC Fond du Lac 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fincantieri Marinette Marine 1,714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Bay Area 979 FTE
CITY-NEAR FSP-Marinette 819 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Controls 809 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0404 Fort Worth 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0601 Westfield 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Region : Beu 24.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Warner's Outdoor Solutions, Inc. 24.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mountainview Medical Center 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations Maintenance and Collections 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Clinton 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Cannon AFB NM (3818) 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.