General medical and surgical hospitals · Montana

Mountainview Medical Center

White Sulphur Springs, MT · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountainview Medical Center runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Mountainview Medical Center: 4.7 TCR = 63% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountainview Medical Center safety composite

Mountainview Medical Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Mountainview Medical Center injury rate improved

Mountainview Medical Center's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=1.8 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · White Sulphur Springs, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.7 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/55
  • PHOTO ThedaCare Medical Ce…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ThedaCare Medical Center New London (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Mountainview Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mountainview Medical Center averages 4.7 TCR (63% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mountainview Medical Center TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=1.8 · 2022=6 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 7.5

Where Mountainview Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 55 General medical and surgical h employers in Montana.

Mountainview Medical Center (59 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mountainview Medical Center
Mountainview Medical Center (59 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mountainview Medical Center has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.4 10.4 5 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.4 0.0 3 0 0
2018 7.9 0.0 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MT · White Sulphur Springs

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ThedaCare Medical Center New London 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aspirus Keweenaw Hospital 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ST CATHERINE OF SIENA MEDICAL CENTER 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eminent Medical Center 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shumaker Trucking and Excavating Contractors, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1265 Billings 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREAT FALLS_1441426 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Missoula SNF Operations, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-TCR Trucare Living Centers - Selma 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitchell Graphics 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients dba/DAR PRO Solutions 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maas Brothers Construction Co., Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marinette Plant 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor West Deptford 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations Maintenance and Collections 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Clinton 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.