Homes for the aged with nursing care · New York

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center

Cohoes, NY · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center: 5.8 TCR = 90% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center safety composite

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2018

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center injury rate improved

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center's TCR fell 3.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cohoes, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.8 · 90% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #313/616
  • PHOTO Medallion Post-Acute…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medallion Post-Acute Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center averages 5.8 TCR (90% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=2 · BLS 6.5

Where Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #313 safest of 616 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in New York.

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center (78 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center
Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center (78 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 9.7 9.7 5 0 0
2016 5.9 5.9 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Cohoes

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Cohoes, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medallion Post-Acute Rehabilitation 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresno Postacute Care, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Pablo Healthcare and Wellness Center 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC Healthcare Fort Oglethorpe 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Key Capture Energy, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branch Restoration 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skanska USA Commercial Development 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&H Excavating Inc 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eddy Village Green 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ Capital Regional Geriatric Center 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR FPI Mechanical, Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Capital Regional Geriatric Center 250 FTE
NAT-TCR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 5801-01 Toyota Weld/Princeton, IN 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR M.L. Wyatt Operations, Inc, DBA Hultman 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE RDU - Airport United Airlines Offices 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron Hill Brewery- Voorhees 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Shale Columbus Brick 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Volkswagen 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.