Civil engineering services · California

Mark Thomas & Company

San Jose, CA · ~297 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mark Thomas & Company runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Civil engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

Mark Thomas & Company: 1.1 TCR = 230% of Civil engineering services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mark Thomas & Company safety composite

Mark Thomas & Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mark Thomas & Company: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2022

Mark Thomas & Company's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.1 · 230% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #48/83
  • PHOTO INNOVATION CENTER
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~297 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INNOVATION CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mark Thomas & Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mark Thomas & Company averages 1.1 TCR (230% of the Civil engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mark Thomas & Company TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Mark Thomas & Company falls in its industry

690 Civil engineering services establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 83 Civil engineering services employers in California.

Mark Thomas & Company (297 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mark Thomas & Company
Mark Thomas & Company (297 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Mark Thomas & Company has more employees than the Civil engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.3 2.3 5 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · CA · San Jose

690 Civil engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INNOVATION CENTER 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Madison 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albuquerque, NM - 2 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Products and Services Inc. (EPSI) 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mitsubishi Electric US Inc.-10 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE HP Hood LLC - Plant 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - SAN FRANCISCO 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE NXP USA, Inc Holger 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR H A Sack.Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Oak Brook Public Works Department 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MasTec Transmission & Substation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reconn 9009 (Usma) 8025 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Hardie Building Prod. 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE 890 - Ottawa DC 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730233-FO 297 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.