Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Marland Place

Andover, MA · ~103 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marland Place runs at 375% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Marland Place: 14.3 TCR = 375% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marland Place safety composite

Marland Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2022

Marland Place injury rate improved

Marland Place's TCR fell 6.7 from 11.5 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=8.0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=36.0 · 2021=18.4 · 2022=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Andover, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 375% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #177/210
  • PHOTO Hawthorn Court at Ah…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hawthorn Court at Ahwatukee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Marland Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marland Place averages 14.3 TCR (375% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marland Place TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=8 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=36 · 2021=18.4 · 2022=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Marland Place falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Marland Place (103 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Marland Place
Marland Place (103 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Marland Place has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2021 18.4 15.1 2 9 0
2020 36.0 33.0 3 21 0
2019 6.7 5.4 5 0 0
2017 8.0 4.0 6 0 0
2016 11.5 8.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Andover

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 78 employers in Andover, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hawthorn Court at Ahwatukee 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Five Star Premier Residences of Hollywood 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Laurels and the Haven in Highland Creek 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dogwood Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC 14.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weston & Sampson Services, Inc. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weston & Sampson Construction, Maintenance, & Repair, Inc. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wakefield Container 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fagron Sterile Services Boston 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips NAM Field Sales & Service 4,812 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Andover_MA 4,577 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips Healthcare 2,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer, Inc. 2,276 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawthorn Court at Ahwatukee 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-AHSCM04 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01757 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtimade Dairy Inc. 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE USM Store #513 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Wolfington Leasing Corporation 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crestavilla 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bishop Lifting Products - Houston 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.