Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing · Arizona

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 123% of Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. safety composite

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. injury rate improved

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.8 from 5.3 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.5 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325411 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO YLEO Distribution Ce…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: YLEO Distribution Centers (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (123% of the Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.5 · 2022=5 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. falls in its industry

260 Vitamins, uncompounded, manufa establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Vitamins, uncompounded, manufa employers in Arizona.

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.
Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. has fewer employees than the Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.1 2.5 4 0 0
2022 5.0 3.3 2 1 0
2020 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.7 4.0 5 0 0
2017 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2016 5.3 4.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325411 · AZ · Phoenix

260 Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR YLEO Distribution Centers 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NutraStar 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mile High Labs 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taneytown 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Surprise 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Tennessee - Nashville Division 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Group 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norstan Communications, Inc.(Intel-Chandler,AZ)* 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Holmes Redimix, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stainless Steel Limited 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR South Ice Cream Freezer 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 192 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Badger Plug Company 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - LFT 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE DuMor, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCCK-Transportation Center 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.