Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing · Tennessee

Martin Machine Works

Decaturville, TN · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martin Machine Works runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Martin Machine Works: 1.0 TCR = 32% of Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martin Machine Works safety composite

Martin Machine Works scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2023

Martin Machine Works injury rate improved

Martin Machine Works's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Decaturville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Pi-Co Precision Fabr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pi-Co Precision Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Martin Machine Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martin Machine Works averages 1.0 TCR (32% of the Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martin Machine Works TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Martin Machine Works falls in its industry

391 Turning machines (i.e., lathes establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Turning machines (i.e., lathes employers in Tennessee.

Martin Machine Works (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Martin Machine Works
Martin Machine Works (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Martin Machine Works has fewer employees than the Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalwo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · TN · Decaturville

391 Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 4 employers in Decaturville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pi-Co Precision Fabrication 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Nanotechnology Systems 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bulldog Automation, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Fin Machines, Inc 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain Electric Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Parent Company, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky - Bartlett 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Constructors, Inc. 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westwood Health Care and Rehabilitation Center 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR AHC Westwood 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCA-Largo Industries, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Michiana SC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bucyrus Svc Ctr 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearvue Glass & Mirror Co. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #39 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tulsa/Weleetka 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dresden Plant 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shipley Do-Nut Flour and Supply Co LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stateline Medical Center 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.