Kit assembling and packaging services · Rhode Island

Martin Street

Cumberland, RI · ~232 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Martin Street runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Kit assembling and packaging services workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
2.6
industry benchmark (BLS)
19
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Martin Street's OSHA Total Case Rate of 6.0 to the Kit assembling and packaging services BLS benchmark of 2.6 (232% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Martin Street's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.6 industry benchmark.

234567 20232024 5.72.6 Industry benchmarkMartin Street TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 561910.

Where Martin Street falls in its industry

259 Kit assembling and packaging s establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Trend analysis for Martin Street

Between 2023 and 2024, Martin Street's Total Case Rate improved from 6.3 to 5.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 10% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 5.7, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 6.3, a spread of 0.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Martin Street recorded 19 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 19 injuries, 6 illnesses shown on this page for Martin Street are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 561910 - Kit assembling and packaging services.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

9 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 383,733 hours worked = 4.69 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Martin Street (this establishment) 6.04 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Kit assembling and packaging services industry avg 2.60 BLS IIF, NAICS 561910
Rhode Island state avg (all industries) 5.62 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Martin Street to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.7 11 0 0
2023 6.3 4.5 8 6 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Martin Street's reported OSHA injury record versus its Kit assembling and packaging services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 232% of the Kit assembling and packaging services benchmark, Martin Street reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Kit assembling and packaging services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Martin Street's safety grade?
Martin Street has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 2.6 for Kit assembling and packaging services.
How many injuries has Martin Street reported?
Martin Street has reported 19 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Rhode Island, and by nearby establishments in Cumberland - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.