Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing · Rhode Island
Tiffany and Company
Cumberland, RI · ~603 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 3.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Tiffany and Company runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 3.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 68
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Tiffany and Company's OSHA Total Case Rate of 3.9 to the Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (118% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Tiffany and Company's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Tiffany and Company falls in its industry
81 Jewel settings and mountings, establishmentsSafer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.
Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Jewel settings and mountings, employers in Rhode Island.
Trend analysis for Tiffany and Company
Between 2022 and 2024, Tiffany and Company's Total Case Rate improved from 4.5 to 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 44% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 2.5, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 4.6, a spread of 2.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Tiffany and Company recorded 68 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 68 injuries shown on this page for Tiffany and Company are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 339910 - Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
12 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,019,017 hours worked = 2.36 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Tiffany and Company (this establishment) | 3.91 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Bracelets, precious metal, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 339910 |
| Rhode Island state avg (all industries) | 5.62 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Tiffany and Company to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 13 reportable incidents · 13 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 27 reportable incidents · 27 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 28 reportable incidents · 28 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Tiffany and Company's reported OSHA injury record versus its Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 118% of the Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing benchmark, Tiffany and Company reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Jewel settings and mountings, precious metal, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tiffany and Company's safety grade?
How many injuries has Tiffany and Company reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Rhode Island, and by nearby establishments in Cumberland - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.9)
Similar size (~603 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.