Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arizona

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson

Tolleson, AZ · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson safety composite

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson held a steady TCR band

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Tolleson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/25
  • PHOTO Progressive Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Progressive Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 25 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arizona.

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson (48 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson
Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson (48 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.8 8.8 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AZ · Tolleson

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 153 employers in Tolleson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Progressive Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPI 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFW - MACH 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cox & Company, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJAZ Construction, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vastco, Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Phoenix 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rikoshea Contracting Inc. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBS Tolleson Inc 1,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0017-0016-06501 FAC-06501-TOLLESON-AZ 740 FTE
CITY-NEAR Windigo Logistics 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR Br 125 - Communications Test Design Inc 566 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Meadow Terminal 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Power- IA 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Athens Regional Physician Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Delaware Valley Society of Transplant Surgeons dba Gift of Life Donor Program 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Hospice - Ipu 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Augusta, LLC - Bracken 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sendik's Food Market Bayside 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riley Welding, LLC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.