Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Riley Welding, LLC

Hanover, PA · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riley Welding, LLC runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Riley Welding, LLC: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riley Welding, LLC safety composite

Riley Welding, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riley Welding, LLC: 2.0 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2020

Riley Welding, LLC's TCR rose 7.5 from 2.0 in 2016 to 9.6 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Hanover, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #17/38
  • PHOTO McGregor Industrial …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McGregor Industrial Steel Fabrication, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Riley Welding, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riley Welding, LLC averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riley Welding, LLC TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=9.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Riley Welding, LLC falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 38 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in Pennsylvania.

Riley Welding, LLC (48 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Riley Welding, LLC
Riley Welding, LLC (48 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Riley Welding, LLC has fewer employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.6 4.8 4 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2018 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · PA · Hanover

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 149 employers in Hanover, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McGregor Industrial Steel Fabrication, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Container Research Corporation 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1150 Cheyenne 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imperial Systems 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sylvan America, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade North 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rolling Rock Building Stone, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Stores Building 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER DOOR & MILLWORK HUB 389 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanover Manufacturing Campus 1,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Hanover 1,090 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snyders-Lance, Inc.- Hanover Manufacturing Facility 850 FTE
NAT-TCR RLC Coburg 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Corporate Services 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gretna, Ne - Midwest Dist Office 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Saginaw Transit Authority Regional Services 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sendik's Food Market Bayside 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Augusta, LLC - Bracken 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCBSNC Fayetteville 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.