Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons

Marlborough, MA · ~68 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons: 9.5 TCR = 249% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons safety composite

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2022→2024

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons injury rate improved

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons's TCR fell 2.9 from 9.5 in 2022 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.5 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Marlborough, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #128/210
  • PHOTO Aegis of Issaquah
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Issaquah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons averages 9.5 TCR (249% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons TCR series: 2022=9.5 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons (68 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons
Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons (68 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mary Ann Morse at New Horizons has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2023 12.2 10.1 2 4 0
2022 9.5 9.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Marlborough

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 121 employers in Marlborough, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Issaquah 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Farm Village 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10568 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eldercare of Mid Missouri XIV, Inc 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE BROCKTON - E ASHLAND ST BLDG-MA07 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perini Management Services, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick Construction Corp 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon - Marlborough 2,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Marlborough_MA 2,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field 1,438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hologic : Marlborough Campus 700 FTE
NAT-TCR Lbb-Ground Ops 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry Farm Village 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheriff 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona City 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wrico Stamping of Minnesota 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heniff Transportation Systems LLC - Hazel Crest, Il 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westport Construction Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solo Interiors and Painting 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.