Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials · Missouri

Maryland Heights

Maryland Heights, MO · ~74 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Heights runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials workplace, earning a grade B.

Maryland Heights: 1.1 TCR = 51% of Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Heights safety composite

Maryland Heights scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maryland Heights: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Maryland Heights's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423330 · Maryland Heights, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.1 · 51% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO Erie Materials Auburn
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Erie Materials Auburn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Heights averages 1.1 TCR (51% of the Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Heights TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.4 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.2

Where Maryland Heights falls in its industry

953 Wholesale Distribution of Roof establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 Wholesale Distribution of Roof employers in Missouri.

Maryland Heights (74 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Heights
Maryland Heights (74 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7

Maryland Heights has more employees than the Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2020 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423330 · MO · Maryland Heights

953 Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 112 employers in Maryland Heights, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Erie Materials Auburn 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wausau Supply Company: Waudena 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 101 - ORANGE BRANCH 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 219 - OAK FOREST BRANCH 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Underground 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Payne Family Homes 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC Industrial 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raineri Construction, LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR GHQ-Global Headquarters 2,598 FTE
CITY-NEAR GHQ-Global Headquaters 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR MO_Maryland Heights_13736 Riverport_21111080 1,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino St. Louis 874 FTE
NAT-TCR Walkup Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyway Cement 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR R39 Aer - Redwood City 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Services 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Bend Industries 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE BROADLEAF 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocelot Engineering Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABG-Alexandria 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.