Apartment rental or leasing · Maryland

Maryland Management Company

Hanover, MD · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Management Company runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Apartment rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade B.

Maryland Management Company: 0.8 TCR = 57% of Apartment rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Management Company safety composite

Maryland Management Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maryland Management Company held a steady TCR band

Maryland Management Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Hanover, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO NC-Charlotte (Hunter…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NC-Charlotte (Huntersville) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Management Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Management Company averages 0.8 TCR (57% of the Apartment rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Management Company TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Maryland Management Company falls in its industry

1,100 Apartment rental or leasing establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Apartment rental or leasing employers in Maryland.

Maryland Management Company (43 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Management Company
Maryland Management Company (43 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Maryland Management Company has fewer employees than the Apartment rental or leasing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · MD · Hanover

1,100 Apartment rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 121 employers in Hanover, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NC-Charlotte (Huntersville) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Related Management Company LP 410 Tenth 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Oxford Management LLC Dallas Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sycamore Village, LP 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beltsville Warehouse 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBG 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banneker Ventures 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Building Services LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR PPE Casino Resorts Maryland d/b/a Live! Casino & Hotel 2,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keller North America Inc. 2,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ciena - Remote workers 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEAPOD HANOVER WAREHOUSE 1,556 FTE
NAT-TCR Rycon Construction, Inc - Fort Lauderdale 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Lakeville 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Olympic Systems Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR EMSI Corporate Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE GP Reeves INC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manlove Storage Field 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haskins Inc's Establishment 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.