General warehousing and storage · California

Marysville Distribution

Olivehurst, CA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marysville Distribution runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

Marysville Distribution: 4.0 TCR = 68% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marysville Distribution safety composite

Marysville Distribution scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Marysville Distribution: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

Marysville Distribution's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Olivehurst, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 68% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #555/1131
  • PHOTO 30682 CAPSTONE UNFI …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30682 CAPSTONE UNFI CONV ALLENTOWN PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Marysville Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marysville Distribution averages 4.0 TCR (68% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marysville Distribution TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Marysville Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #555 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Marysville Distribution (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Marysville Distribution
Marysville Distribution (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Marysville Distribution has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2022 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2021 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Olivehurst

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 21 employers in Olivehurst, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30682 CAPSTONE UNFI CONV ALLENTOWN PA 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3510 LOWE S ALEXANDRIA LA XDT 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCI Wilmington LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trimfoot Company, LLC - Fredericktown 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 563 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 59 2,409 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 42 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAYUB - YUBA CITY 109 FTE
NAT-TCR Glen Ellyn Park District 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Westbrook 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TW Metals - Cranbury 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nodland Construction Co Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Region Cooperative - Buffalo Lake 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lansing Building Products-Charlotte NC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fulton Logging Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE M-4 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.