Construction management, water and sewer line · Minnesota

Nodland Construction Co Inc

Alexandria, MN · ~54 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nodland Construction Co Inc runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewer line workplace, earning a grade D.

Nodland Construction Co Inc: 4.0 TCR = 141% of Construction management, water and sewer line BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nodland Construction Co Inc safety composite

Nodland Construction Co Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2018→2024

Nodland Construction Co Inc injury rate improved

Nodland Construction Co Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.7 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Alexandria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 141% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #17/32
  • PHOTO Phase 1 Construction…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phase 1 Construction INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Nodland Construction Co Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nodland Construction Co Inc averages 4.0 TCR (141% of the Construction management, water and sewer line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nodland Construction Co Inc TCR series: 2018=6.7 · 2019=0 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Nodland Construction Co Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 32 Construction management, water employers in Minnesota.

Nodland Construction Co Inc (54 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nodland Construction Co Inc
Nodland Construction Co Inc (54 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Nodland Construction Co Inc has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 0 1 0
2022 6.6 2.2 3 0 0
2021 6.1 2.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.7 6.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MN · Alexandria

1,614 Construction management, water and sewer line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phase 1 Construction INC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emergency Sewer Contract 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Decker Construction Services, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Staab Construction Corp - Marshfield, WI 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Fabco Machine Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TW Metals - Cranbury 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Westbrook 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 51N5-516L 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MetalKraft 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park & Recreation 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blair Senior Services, Inc. Transportation 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stapp Construction, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.