Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Georgia

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG

Mc Donough, GA · ~86 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG safety composite

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2021

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG injury rate improved

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Mc Donough, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/25
  • PHOTO Coatings and Adhesiv…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coatings and Adhesives Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 25 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in Georgia.

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG
Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Masco Coatings Group McDonough MFG has more employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.0 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · GA · Mc Donough

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 4 employers in Mc Donough, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coatings and Adhesives Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR US IL Rockford Colorant Plant 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR REFCOTEC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromaflo Technologies 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Operating Fleet 200 Miller Street Valdosta 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE VNG Newport News 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE LanzaJet 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitzgerald 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Behr Paint Company McDonough MFG 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Behr Paint Company Mc Donough Distribution 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masco Coatings Group Mc Donough Distribution 49 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunflower #8217 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Furniture Rental-Seattle 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Casepak 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Renew Valve & Machine 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE KTA Super Stores 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCSC Martins Ferry Plant 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sinclair Printing Company 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shapes Precision Manufact 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.