Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Washington

Mason Transit Authority

Shelton, WA · ~72 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mason Transit Authority runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade C.

Mason Transit Authority: 4.3 TCR = 96% of Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mason Transit Authority safety composite

Mason Transit Authority scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2021→2024

Mason Transit Authority injury rate improved

Mason Transit Authority's TCR fell 5.7 from 7.3 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.3 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Shelton, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO North Tonawanda, NY-…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Tonawanda, NY-Shawnee Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Mason Transit Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mason Transit Authority averages 4.3 TCR (96% of the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mason Transit Authority TCR series: 2021=7.3 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Mason Transit Authority falls in its industry

421 Local transit systems, mixed m establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Local transit systems, mixed m employers in Washington.

Mason Transit Authority (72 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mason Transit Authority
Mason Transit Authority (72 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Mason Transit Authority has fewer employees than the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2021 7.3 5.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · WA · Shelton

421 Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 36 employers in Shelton, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Tonawanda, NY-Shawnee Road 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-1003 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisburg, PA - Sycamore Street Maintenance Shop 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55625 Rutgers 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Pasco, WA Farm 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alaska Warrior 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Othello 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Trails Association 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Squaxin Island Gaming dba Little Creek Casino Resort 810 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mason General Hospital & Clinics 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mason General Hospital 556 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2121 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Janus FL Distribution Center 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NORDAM Transparency 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Western Manor Company 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Regional Medical Center - EVS 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martinic Engineering AZ 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanicville, NY--Route 67 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.