Retirement homes with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Masonic Villages at Sewickley

Sewickley, PA · ~429 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masonic Villages at Sewickley runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Masonic Villages at Sewickley: 7.3 TCR = 113% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masonic Villages at Sewickley safety composite

Masonic Villages at Sewickley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Masonic Villages at Sewickley: 5.4 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Masonic Villages at Sewickley's TCR rose 0.9 from 5.4 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sewickley, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.3 · 113% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #365/754
  • PHOTO Washington Soldiers …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~429 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washington Soldiers Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Masonic Villages at Sewickley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masonic Villages at Sewickley averages 7.3 TCR (113% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masonic Villages at Sewickley TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=3.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=11 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Masonic Villages at Sewickley falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #365 safest of 754 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Pennsylvania.

Masonic Villages at Sewickley (429 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Masonic Villages at Sewickley
Masonic Villages at Sewickley (429 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Masonic Villages at Sewickley has more employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 5.9 8 7 0
2023 6.2 5.8 4 11 0
2022 12.2 9.0 15 12 0
2021 6.1 4.2 11 5 0
2020 11.0 9.1 24 4 0
2019 7.7 7.7 20 0 0
2017 3.8 3.4 10 0 0
2016 5.4 5.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Sewickley

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 31 employers in Sewickley, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washington Soldiers Home 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LIFE CARE CENTER OF CARROLLTON 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1190 PIERPONT CENTER 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siena Gardens 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Pipeline- Hollidaysburg, PA 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kawneer Company, Inc. 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Harrisburg 045 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Concordville 126 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Medical Facilities - Heritage Valley Health System 2,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Valley Sewickley 950 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Valley Health System 821 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPP1 485 FTE
NAT-TCR COH Parks Maint Area 1 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Weber Refrigeration & Heating Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 734/SAN 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice Powell - 0725 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oceaneering-Marine Services Division 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Orthopaedic Hospital 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mom365, Inc. 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volunteers of America Northern California & Northern Nevada 429 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.