Ship repair done in a shipyard · Virginia

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division

Chesapeake, VA · ~429 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Ship repair done in a shipyard workplace, earning a grade A.

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division safety composite

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division: 0.6 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Chesapeake, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/73
  • PHOTO Curtiss-Wright Fleet…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~429 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtiss-Wright Fleet Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oceaneering-Marine Services Division averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Oceaneering-Marine Services Division falls in its industry

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 73 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers in Virginia.

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division (429 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oceaneering-Marine Services Division
Oceaneering-Marine Services Division (429 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Oceaneering-Marine Services Division has more employees than the Ship repair done in a shipyard median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.0 7 0 0
2023 1.7 0.7 7 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2020 1.1 0.4 5 0 0
2019 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 5 0 0
2017 1.0 0.3 6 0 0
2016 0.6 0.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · VA · Chesapeake

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright Fleet Solutions 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Riviera Beach Campus (1217) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verret Shipyard, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vigor Hawaii 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE NIBCO Stuarts Draft 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Star Inc 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Google Fiber Project 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR Crestline 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Acloche LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelbyville - A377 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Seither & Cherry Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Masonic Villages at Sewickley 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Orthopaedic Hospital 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volunteers of America Northern California & Northern Nevada 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mom365, Inc. 429 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.