Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Connecticut

Masonicare at Home

Wallingford, CT · ~103 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masonicare at Home runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Masonicare at Home: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masonicare at Home safety composite

Masonicare at Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

Masonicare at Home injury rate improved

Masonicare at Home's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Wallingford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/31
  • PHOTO Plattsburgh
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plattsburgh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Masonicare at Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masonicare at Home averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masonicare at Home TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Masonicare at Home falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 31 Companion services for disable employers in Connecticut.

Masonicare at Home (103 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Masonicare at Home
Masonicare at Home (103 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Masonicare at Home has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 2.3 2 1 0
2022 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CT · Wallingford

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plattsburgh 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Talem Home Care of Fort Collins 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trivium Life Services Sioux City 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Home Care Services of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HARP Home Services 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA CT East Hartford Plant 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE APS Technology Connecticut 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE 15 Progress Drive 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR LPI Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Miller Hand County Hospital 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heyl Management 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LionHeart Critical Power Specialists, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kinco Constructors 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medilodge of Milford 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medilodge of Richmond 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Terminal 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.