Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Tennessee

Nashville Terminal

Nashville, TN · ~103 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nashville Terminal runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Nashville Terminal: 1.8 TCR = 40% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nashville Terminal safety composite

Nashville Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Nashville Terminal injury rate improved

Nashville Terminal's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Nashville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 40% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #31/128
  • PHOTO meador boys express
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: meador boys express (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Nashville Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nashville Terminal averages 1.8 TCR (40% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nashville Terminal TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Nashville Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 128 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Tennessee.

Nashville Terminal (103 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Nashville Terminal
Nashville Terminal (103 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Nashville Terminal has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 2.9 1.4 4 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2018 2.5 1.3 4 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TN · Nashville

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR meador boys express 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBM Logistics, INC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matthew Brian Hitchcock, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCW, INC ATLANTA 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gibson Electric Membership Corporation 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103887 - Nashville Connector 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE John J. Campbell Memphis 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCrory Electric Company, Inc. 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Rochester 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Human Services Center Sunnybrook 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Schexnailder Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvey 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Masonicare at Home 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kinco Constructors 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Willows at Bellevue 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Ecology Taylor 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.