Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Ohio

Material Sciences Corporation

Walbridge, OH · ~81 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Material Sciences Corporation runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Material Sciences Corporation: 6.3 TCR = 191% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Material Sciences Corporation safety composite

Material Sciences Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Material Sciences Corporation: 2.6 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Material Sciences Corporation's TCR rose 7.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Walbridge, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 191% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #52/62
  • PHOTO PBTT, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PBTT, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Material Sciences Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Material Sciences Corporation averages 6.3 TCR (191% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Material Sciences Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Material Sciences Corporation falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 62 Electroplating metals and form employers in Ohio.

Material Sciences Corporation (81 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Material Sciences Corporation
Material Sciences Corporation (81 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Material Sciences Corporation has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 1.8 9 2 0
2023 7.1 1.6 9 0 0
2022 6.6 3.3 8 0 0
2021 9.6 3.9 10 0 0
2020 6.9 2.3 6 0 0
2019 6.4 0.0 3 2 0
2018 4.7 1.2 4 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 1 0
2016 2.6 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · OH · Walbridge

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 28 employers in Walbridge, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PBTT, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Voss Clark 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR J & M Plating Inc 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Plating, LLC 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE A-1 Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio's Electric Cooperatives 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zanesville Service Center 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Combs Interior Specialties, Inc. 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge Office 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEM Industrial Inc. (All Companies) 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rudolph Libbe Inc - Walbridge 385 FTE
NAT-TCR BJs Uxbridge 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - RIC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SHIROKI North America - Dalton 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor's Square Mall Complex 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SRC Automotive, Inc. (2) 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosendale Dairy, LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern WV Asphalt 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coke Northeast - Cape Cod 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.