Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Voss Clark

Jeffersonville, IN · ~131 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Voss Clark runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Voss Clark: 6.2 TCR = 189% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Voss Clark safety composite

Voss Clark scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

Voss Clark injury rate improved

Voss Clark's TCR fell 4.0 from 10.3 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.3 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Jeffersonville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #26/30
  • PHOTO Eastern Plating, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastern Plating, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Voss Clark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Voss Clark averages 6.2 TCR (189% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Voss Clark TCR series: 2016=10.3 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=6 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Voss Clark falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 30 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Indiana.

Voss Clark (131 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Voss Clark
Voss Clark (131 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Voss Clark has more employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 1.6 5 3 0
2023 6.1 2.3 6 2 0
2022 4.1 3.3 5 0 0
2021 3.1 1.6 3 1 0
2020 6.0 3.4 7 0 0
2019 6.7 3.4 10 0 0
2018 6.0 4.0 9 0 0
2017 7.6 4.2 11 0 0
2016 10.3 3.2 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · IN · Jeffersonville

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 173 employers in Jeffersonville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastern Plating, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independent Plating 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBTT, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Material Sciences Corporation 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rose Acre Farms Corporate Office 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Valley Gas 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Blakley Corporation 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Louisville 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SDF8 3,574 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SDF8 3,001 FTE
CITY-NEAR RHN Clark Memorial Hospital, LLC 1,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Memorial Health 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Hospital Company of South Carolina, LLC (Regency Florence) 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Olympic Blvd/La 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Transit MJR Garage 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland's Custom Cabinets, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Redwood Falls 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Estrada'S Ag Services, Inc. 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trans-System Inc - Olathe 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor South 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.