Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Michigan

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division

Blissfield, MI · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division safety composite

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division held a steady TCR band

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Blissfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Norgren Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norgren Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division falls in its industry

298 Gas valves, industrial-type, m establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Gas valves, industrial-type, m employers in Michigan.

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division (38 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division
Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division (38 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Maxitrol Company-Blissfield Division has fewer employees than the Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · MI · Blissfield

298 Gas valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 8 employers in Blissfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norgren Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Tec Manufacturing 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeltaValve - Sandy 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR LW Engineering Plant 4 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR L&W Engineering/Autokiniton 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autokiniton Blissfield 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uckele Health & Nutrition 268 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1832 San Antonio, TX 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Codonics Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jerry's Hyundai, LLC. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Paterson Wa (Watts Frozen Veg) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northwestern Regional Operations 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trujillo Alto Online 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Park at Valley Village 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeShazo LLC 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.