Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Tennessee

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro

Murfreesboro, TN · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro: 8.3 TCR = 253% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro safety composite

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2022→2024

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro injury rate improved

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro's TCR fell 3.5 from 14.3 in 2022 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=14.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Murfreesboro, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 253% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO MSM Sheet Metal & St…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MSM Sheet Metal & Steel Fabrication, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro averages 8.3 TCR (253% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro TCR series: 2022=14.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Tennessee.

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro (21 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro
Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro (21 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Maxsteel Buildings Murfreesboro has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 10.8 2 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.3 14.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · TN · Murfreesboro

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MSM Sheet Metal & Steel Fabrication, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUSTOM METAL FABRICATORS INC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrueNorth Steel 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 1- Lake Air 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTH TEXAS FARM 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenpoint Ag- Gin & Warehouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Pest Control, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obion County Growout 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Vista Metals Corp 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baker Distributing South 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shamrock Cabinet & Fixture Corp. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Ridge Alz 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jackson Young Drywall Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXDA-Dallas,TX 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 058 Abilene 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Springs MO 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.