Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Missouri

May Technology & Manufacturing

Kansas City, MO · ~122 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

May Technology & Manufacturing runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

May Technology & Manufacturing: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

May Technology & Manufacturing safety composite

May Technology & Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

May Technology & Manufacturing held a steady TCR band

May Technology & Manufacturing's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=3.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Atec, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atec, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

May Technology & Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows May Technology & Manufacturing averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

May Technology & Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where May Technology & Manufacturing falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Missouri.

May Technology & Manufacturing (122 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate May Technology & Manufacturing
May Technology & Manufacturing (122 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

May Technology & Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 1.8 4 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2017 3.8 3.0 5 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · MO · Kansas City

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atec, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niles Precision Company 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMI - Vista 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laclede Electric Cooperative 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laclede Chain Maryville 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO008 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Ford of St Joseph, LLC 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Desert Plumbing, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Refresco - Carlisle 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stonegate Surgery Center, LP 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morton Hatchery 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sran Ag ll 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Scapes Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Araujo Bros Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE PARC Joliet Nursing 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.